INTRA ASEAN-5 CAPITAL FLOWS: DO THEY REPRESENT NEOCLASSICAL BELIEF OR LUCAS PARADOX?

  • Nurul Qolbi Diponegoro University
  • Akhmad Syakir Kurnia Diponegoro University
Keywords: capital flow, neoclassical belief, lucas paradox, panel data model

Abstract

In the neoclassical belief, capital flows downhill from rich to poor countries as a consequence of capital endowment variation. In contrast to the neoclassical belief, Lucas found evidence that capital tends to flow uphill. This paper investigates the intra ASEAN-5 capital flows. Using panel estimation, we found that marginal product of capital, human capital, total factor productivity growth, and the quality of institutions appear as determinants for the capital flow from Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand to Singapore as a host country. On the contrary, the capital flow from Singapore to other ASEAN countries as host countries is encouraged only by the quality of institutions, human capital as well as per capita GDP. The result shows that Lucas variables emerge as determinants for the uphill and downhill capital flow in ASEAN-5. In the meantime, marginal product of capital that represents neoclassical variable appears as the determinant for uphill capital flow from other ASEAN countries to Singapore. This gives significant insight that Lucas variables emerge as companion to the neoclassical variables in explaining intra ASEAN capital flow

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfaro, Laura, S. Kalemli-Ozcan, dan V. Volosovych. (2007). Capital Flows in a Globalized World: The Role of Policies and Institutions.

Alfaro, Laura, S. Kalemli-Ozcan, dan V. Volosovych. (2008). Why Doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? An Empirical Investigation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 90 (2), h. 347-368.

Alfaro, Laura, S. Kalemli-Ozcan, dan S. Sayek. (2009). FDI, Productivity and Financial Development, The World Economy, h. 111-135.

Appleyard, Dennis R., A. J. Field, dan S. L. Cobb. (2010). International Economics (7th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2013). ASEAN Investment Report 2012: The Changing FDI Landscape. Jakarta: The ASEAN Secretariat.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2014). ASEAN FDI Database. Jakarta: The ASEAN Secretariat.

Azman-Saini, W. N. W., A. Z. Baharumshah, dan S. H. Law. (2010). Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Freedom and Economic Growth: International Evidence, Economic Modelling, Vol. 27, h. 1079-1089.

Baltagi, Badi H. (2008). Econometrics (4th Edition). New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Blomqvist, Hans C. (2002). Extending The Second Wing: The Outward Direct Investment of Singapore, Department of Economics Working Papers 3, University of Vaasa.

Borensztein, E., J. De Gregorio, J-W. Lee. (1998). How does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 45, h. 115-135.

Djaafara, Rizal A., dkk (Eds). (2012). Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN 2015: Proses Harmonisasi di Tengah Persaingan. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Ellingsen, Gaute, W. Likumahuwa, dan P. Nunnenkamp. (2006). Outward FDI by Singapore: A Different Animal?,Transnational Corporations, Vol. 15, No. 2, h. 1-40.

Herrmann, Sabine, dan J. Kleinert. (2014). Lucas Paradox and Allocation Puzzle - Is the Euro Area Different?,Discussion Paper No. 06/2014. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.

Hsu, Locknie. (2013). Singapore: Inward FDI and Its Policy Context, 2012, Inward and Outward FDI Country Profiles (2nd Edition), h. 1022-1043. New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.

Kementerian Luar Negeri RI. (2012). ASEAN Selayang Pandang (Edisi 20). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Kerja Sama ASEAN Kementerian Luar Negeri RI.

Lucas, Robert E. (1990). Why Doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? The American Economic Review, Vol. 80 (2), h. 92-96.

Mankiw, N. Gregory. (2013). Macroeconomics (8th Edition). New York: Worth Publishers.

Okada, Keisuke. (2013). The Interaction Effects of Financial Openness and Institutions on International Capital Flows, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 35, h. 131-143.

Pogoda, Barbara. (2012). The Lucas Paradox, Master’s thesis, Universitat Bielefeld.

Rajah, Raisah dan C. Govindaraju. (2013). Malaysia: Inward FDI and Its Policy Context, 2011, Inward and Outward FDI Country Profiles (2nd Edition), h. 894-907. New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.

Salvatore, Dominick. (2013). International Economics (11th Edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Tambunan, Tulus H. (2013). Indonesia: Inward FDI and Its Policy Context, 2011, Inward and Outward FDI Country Profiles (2nd Edition), h. 878-893. New York: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.

World Bank. (2015). World Development Indicators. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Yeung, Henry Wai-chung. (1999). Singapore’s Global Reach: An Executive Report. Singapore: National University of Singapore.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2015-12-02
How to Cite
Qolbi, N., & Kurnia, A. (2015). INTRA ASEAN-5 CAPITAL FLOWS: DO THEY REPRESENT NEOCLASSICAL BELIEF OR LUCAS PARADOX?. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 18(2), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v18i2.521
Section
Articles