PENENTUAN BOBOT RESIKO KREDIT UNTUK RUMAH TINGGAL: STUDI KASUS DI INDONESIA

  • Imansyah Imansyah
  • Mirza Yuniar Isnaeni Mara

Abstract

This paper analyzes the appropriateness of the basic risk weight for the fully secured residential mortgage, recommended in Basel II, to be implemented on Indonesian economy. As the supervisory authorities can customize the 35% of recommended risk weight based on the national arrangements, we analyze the practical ground of the residential mortgage in Indonesia focusing on the probability and the loss given default for this credit type.

The result propose a lower risk weight for a fully secured residential mortgage risk weight. For a different types of residential mortgage, this paper suggest the use of Loan to Value (LTV) ratio to determine the risk weight. Rather than using a uniform 50% risk weight as required by the current regulation, our result recommend to give a different weight for a different LTV class; 75% weight for LTV greater than 90%, 50% for LTV between 80% to 90%, 45% for LTV between 70% to 80%, and 40% for a LTV less than 70%.

However, the adoption of the proposed residential mortgage risk weight is subject to 2 strict prudential criterias; (i) the loan is used as the residence of the borrower; (ii) the loan is secured by the first lien or first legal charge on the residential property.

Keywords: weight risk, bank, mortgage, default, Basel II, Indonesia.

JEL Classification: E51, G21

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

APRA, April 2003, “Discussion Paper: Implementation of the Basel II Capital Framework - Standardised Approach to Credit Risk”.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, June 2004, International Convergence Of Capital Measurement And Capital Standards: A Revised Framework, BIS.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, August 2003, “Implementation of Basel II: Practical Considerations”, BIS.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, October 2004, “An Explanatory Note on the Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions”, BIS.

Calem, Paul S and James R. Follain, 14 January 2005,”An Examination of How the Proposed Bifurcated Implementation of Basel II in the U.S. May Affect Competition among Banking Organizations for Residential Mortgages.”

Coleman,A.,et al.,2005, “Stress Testing Housing Loan Portfolios: A Regulatory Case Study”, APRA.

Federal Reserve US, 30 September 2005, “ANPR for Proposed Revisions to the Current RiskBased Capital Rules”

Fitch IBCA, 21 October 1998, “Canadian Commercial Mortgage Default Study”.

Hong Kong Monetary Authority, 6 October 2005, “Consultation Papers on New Capital Adequacy Standards in Hong Kong”.

Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan Masyarakat FE UI, September 2004, Laporan Akhir Kajian Early Warning Indicators Industri Properti Terhadap Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan.

Monetary Authority of Singapore, September 2004, “Consultation Paper: IRB Approach Asset Class Definitions and Size Limits”.

Moody’s, February 2001, “Default and Recovery Rates of Corporate Bond Issuers:2000”.

Oxford University, 31 May 2004, “LGD Rating for Portfolio of Retail Loans”.

Wong, Jim, et al., November 2004, “Residential Mortgage Default Risk In Hong Kong”, Research Department Hong Kong Monetary Authorityl

PlumX Metrics

Published
2007-09-10
How to Cite
Imansyah, I., & Mara, M. Y. (2007). PENENTUAN BOBOT RESIKO KREDIT UNTUK RUMAH TINGGAL: STUDI KASUS DI INDONESIA. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 10(1), 23 -. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v10i1.218
Section
Articles