HUBUNGAN KAUSAL DINAMIS ANTARA VARIABEL-VARIABEL MONETER UTAMA DAN OUTPUT: KASUS INDONESIA DI BAWAH SISTEM NILAI TUKAR MENGAMBANG DAN MENGAMBANG TERKENDALI

  • Latif Kharie

Abstract

The objective of the study is to analyze the dynamic causal relationship pattern and the characteristic among the primary monetary variables and output under a different exchange rate systems, i.e the floating and managed floating exchange rate system. The model formulated on this study is based on Taylor rule, state contingent rule, and some theories such as monetary transmission mechanism, exchange rate determination, and Keynes’s demand for money and its augmented models.

The type of the study is explanatory research. Variables analyzed consists of real interest rates of Sertifikat Bank Indonesia, real money supply, real exchange rates of rupiah to American dollar, prices and real output. The data used was monthly time series. Sources of data are Bank Indonesia, Badan Pusat Statistik and International Monetary Fund reports, and analyzed for two different periods of observation. The vector error correction model is used as a quantitative model, focuses on the impulse response function analysis.

The results of impulse response function indicate that: (i) the response of monetary policy to changes of real output and price under the floating exchange rate system is positive, and to changes of real exchange rate and price under the managed floating exchange system is also positive; (ii) the response of price to changes of real interest rate, real money supply, real exchange rate and real output under the floating exchange rate system are negative, negative, positive and negative respectively, whereas under the managed floating exchange rates system are negative, positive, negative and positive respectively; and (iii) the response of real output to change of real interest rate under the floating exchange rates system is positive but it is negative under the managed floating exchange rates system.

Keywords: dynamic causal relation, primary monetary variables, output, floating rates system, managed floating exchange rates system

JEL Classification: C32, E52, O24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barro, R. J. 1978. Unanticipated Money, Output and Price Level in United States, Journal of Political Economy. 86: 449-80

Bilson, J. 1978. Monetary Approach to Exchange Rate – Some Empirical Evidence. IMF Staff Paper 25 : 48-75

Bilson, J. O. 1979. The Duetsche Mark/Dollar rate : A Monetary Analysis. In Policy for Employment, Price and Exchange Rates. ed. K. Bruner and A.

Choundry and Parai. Dalam Ferry I dan Sugiharso S. 2004. Kebijakan Moneter, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Inflasi: Pengujian Hipotesis Ekspektasi Rasional dengan Analisis VAR. Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Akademik Tahunan Pertama Dalam Ilmu Ekonomi. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Dornbusch, R. & S. Fischer. 1980. Exchange Rate and The Current Account. American Economic Review 70 : 960 -71

Erwin, H., Whayu, A. N,. & Wahyu, P. 2000. Mekanisme Pengendalian Moneter Dengan Inflasi Sebagai Sasaran Tunggal. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan Vol. 2 No. 4. Direktorat Riset Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Moneter Bank Indonesia: 68 – 122

Fama, E.F., 1981. Stock returns, real activity, inflation and money. American Economic Reviwe, 71, 545-65

Ferry I & Sugiharso, S., 2004. Kebijakan Moneter, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Inflasi: Pengujian Hipotesis Ekspektasi Rasional dengan Analisis VAR. Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Akademik Tahunan Pertama Dalam Ilmu Ekonomi. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Fleming, J., 1962. Domestic Financial Policies Under Fixed and Floating Exchanges Rates. IMF Staff Papers. 9 : 369 – 379

Frenkel, J. A. 1976. A Monetary Approach to Exchange Rate: Doctrinal Aspects and Empirical Evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economic. 78 : 200 – 24

Heikkila, Jaakko. 1998. An Econometric Analysis of UK Demand for Narrow Money 1963 – 1989. Economietrics for Economist Project Report. June.

King. Menvyn. 1997. Change in the UK Monetary Policy: rules and discretion in practice. Journal of Monetary Economics. 39.

Krugman, P.R. & Maurice, O. 2000. International Economic. Fifth Edition, California: Addition – Wesley.

Lee, B., 1992. Causal Relation Among Stocks Returns, Interest Rates, Real Activity, and Inflation. The Journal of Finance, 47, 1591-1603

Mankiw, 2003. Macroeconomics 5th edition. Worth Publishers. New York and Basingstoke.

McGee dan Stasiak. Dalam Ferry I dan Sugiharso S. 2004. Kebijakan Moneter, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Inflasi: Pengujian Hipotesis Ekspektasi Rasional dengan Analisis VAR. Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Akademik Tahunan Pertama Dalam Ilmu Ekonomi. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Muelgini, Y., 2004. Respons Output, Inflasi dan Komponen-Komponen Permintaan Agregat Terhadap Kebijakan Moneter di Indonesia. Makalah Disampaikan Dalam Seminar Akademik Tahunan Pertama Dalam Ilmu Ekonomi. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Mundell, R. A. 1962. The Appropriate Use of Monetary and Fiscal Policy for Internal and External Stability. IMF Staff Papers. 9 : 70 – 79

Mundell, R. A. 1963. Capital Mobility and Stabilisation Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. 29: 475 – 485.

Najand, M. & Gregory N. 1998. Causal Relation Among Stocks Returns, Inflation, Real Activity, and Interest Rates : Evidence From Japan. Global Financial Journal. Vol. 9, Number 1 : 71 – 80

Rahutami, I. 2004. Mekanisme Transmisi Kebijakan Moneter Indonesia dan Penerapan Inflation Targeting, Makalh Disampaikan Dalam Seminar Akademik Tahunan Pertama Dalam Ilmu Ekonomi. Jakarta : Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Romer, D. 2001. Advanced Macroeconomic. International Edition, Mc Graw-Hill

Sack, B. & Volker, W. 2000. Interest- Rate Smoothing and Optimal Monetary Policy : a Review of Recent Emperical Evidence. Journal of Economics and Bussiness. 52 : 2005 – 228

Solikin, 2004. Respons Kebijakan Moneter Yang Optimal di Indonesia. Makalah Disampaikan Dalam Seminar Akademik Tahunan Pertama Dalam Ilmu Ekonomi. Jakarta : Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.

Tan, H.B., & Ahmad Z.B. 1999. Dynamic causal Chain of money, Interest Rate, Output, dan Price in Malaysia : Evidence Based on Vector Error Correction Modelling Analysis. International Economic Journal. Vol. 13. No. 1 Spring : 103 – 120

Taylor, J.B. 1993. Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conferences Series on Public Policy. 39

Taylor, J.B. 1995 The Monetary Transmission Mechanism : an Empircal Framework. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9

Teddy, H. S. et al. 2001. Ekonomi Makro : Teori, Analisis, dan Kebijakan. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Yamak, Rahmi & Kucukkale, Yakup. 1998. Anticipated versus Unanticipated Money in Turkey. Yapi Kredi Economic Reviwe. 9(1).

PlumX Metrics

Published
2007-02-13
How to Cite
Kharie, L. (2007). HUBUNGAN KAUSAL DINAMIS ANTARA VARIABEL-VARIABEL MONETER UTAMA DAN OUTPUT: KASUS INDONESIA DI BAWAH SISTEM NILAI TUKAR MENGAMBANG DAN MENGAMBANG TERKENDALI. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 9(1), 75 -. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v9i1.152
Section
Articles