Dampak Liberalisasi Perdagangan terhadap Perilaku Pembentukan Harga Produk Industri melalui Structure-Conduct Performance Model
Abstract
This paper analyzes the impact of trade liberalization on the domestic price of industry product by utilizing the structure-conduct-performance (SCP) model. Applying the model to a pooled data of the 3 digits ISIC level of Indonesian industry product, the result shows the abnormal price determination on industry level after the increase of trade liberalization. The existence of this phenomenon, the downward profit-margin rigidity, is indicated by the increase of the profit margin, which reduces the social welfare and tends to persist the inflation. A clear consequence for the Indonesian Central Bank, is to faster and increase the credibility of the middle and long term inflation target, either by clarify the policy signal and its consistency and increase the cooperation with the government.
JEL: E31, L11, O24, P23
Keyword:Trade liberalization, Structure-Conduct-Performance, Price, Industry
Downloads
References
Carlton, Dennis W & Jeffrey M. Perloff (2000). Modern Industrial Organization. Addison- Wesley.
Caves, Richard E.(1980). Industrial Trade and Industrial Organization: Introduction. Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 29, No. 2. (Dec. 1980), pp. 113-117.
Clarke, Roger; Stephen Davies, Michael Waterson (1984). The Profitability-Concentration Relation: Market Power or Efficiency?. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.32, No.4 (Jun. 1984), pp. 435-450.
Domowitz, Ian; R. Glenn Hubbard, Bruce C. Petersen (1986). The Intertemporal Stability of the Concentration-Margins Relationship. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.35, No.1 (Sep.1986), pp. 13-34.
Erdem, Erkan & James R. Tybout (2003). Trade Policy and Industrial Sector Responses: Using Evolutionary Models to Interpret the Evidence, Paper presented at the May 2003 Brooking Trade Forum Conference in Washington D.C.
Evans, William N., Luke M. Froeb, Gregory J. Werden (1993). Endogeneity in the Concentration-Price Relationship: Causes, Consequences, and Cures. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.41, No.4 (Dec. 1993), pp. 431-438.
Feridhanusetyawan, Tubagus & Mari Pangestu (2002). Indonesian Trade Liberalization: Estimating The Gains, Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Jakarta.
Holtermann, Sally (1973). Market Structure and Economic Performance in U.K. Manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.22, No.2 (Jun. 1973), pp. 119-139.
Jayanthakumaran, K. (2002). The Impact of Trade Liberalisation on Manufacturing Sector Performance in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature, University of Wollongong Department of Economics Working Paper WP02-07.
Magiera, Stephen L. (2003). Readings in Indonesian Trade Policy (1991-2002). Collection of Papers.
Metin-Ozcan, Kivilcim; Ebru Voyvoda, Erinc Yeldan (2000). On The Patterns Of Trade Liberalization, Oligopolistic Concentration and Profitability: Reflections from Post-1980 Turkish Manufacturing. Bilkent University.
Kim, Chuk Kyo (2003). Industrial Development Strategy for Indonesia: Lessons from Korean Experience. UNSFIR Discussion Paper Series No.03/02.
Pugel, Thomas A. (1980). Foreign Trade and US Market Performance. Journal of Industrial Economics,Vol. 29, No.2 (Dec. 1980), pp.119-29.
Prabowo, Dibyo, Sonia Wardoyo [2004]. AFTA Suatu Pengantar. Edisi 2004/2005. BPFEYOGYAKARTA. Yogyakarta.
Topalova, Petia (2004). Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: The Case of India. IMF Working Paper WP/04/28
Yalcin, Cihan (2000). Price-Cost Margins and Trade Liberalization in Turkish Manufacturing Industry: A Panel Data Analysis. Central Bank of Turkey.
Yang, Yung Y. & Min Hwang (2001). Effects on Trade Liberalization.
Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan / Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
